abstraction
please note:
- the text and code below is from The Pseudopedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{dablink|This article is about the concept of
abstraction in general. For other uses, see
abstraction (disambiguation).}}
Abstraction is the process or result of generalization by reducing the
information content of a
concept or an observable
phenomenon, typically to retain only information which is relevant for a particular purpose. For example, abstracting a leather soccer ball to the more general idea of a
ball retains only the information on general ball attributes and behaviour, eliminating the characteristics of that particular ball.
Origins
{{see also|Modern human behaviour}}The first
symbols of abstract thinking in humans can be traced to fossils dating between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago in Africa.
(1)(2)Thought process
In
philosophical terminology,
abstraction is the
thought process wherein
ideas
(3) are distanced from
objects. Abstraction uses a
strategy of simplification, wherein formerly concrete details are left ambiguous, vague, or undefined; thus effective
communication about things in the abstract requires an
intuitive or common experience between the communicator and the communication recipient. This is true for all verbal/abstract communication.(File:JerryFelix.JPG|right|thumb|100px|Cat on Mat
(picture 1)) For example, many different things can be
red. Likewise, many things sit on surfaces (as in
picture 1, to the right). The property of
redness and the
relation sitting-on are therefore abstractions of those objects. Specifically, the conceptual diagram
graph 1 identifies only three boxes, two ellipses, and four arrows (and their nine labels), whereas the
picture 1 shows much more pictorial detail, with the scores of implied relationships as implicit in the picture rather than with the nine explicit details in the graph.
Graph 1 details some explicit relationships between the objects of the diagram. For example the arrow between the
agent and
CAT:Elsie depicts an example of an
is-a relationship, as does the arrow between the
location and the
MAT. The arrows between the
gerund SITTING and the
nouns
agent and
location express the
diagram's basic relationship;
"agent is SITTING on location";
Elsie is an instance of
CAT.File:Cat-on-mat.svg|thumb|250px|
Conceptual graphConceptual graphAlthough the description
sitting-on (graph 1) is more abstract than the graphic image of a cat sitting on a mat (picture 1), the delineation of abstract things from concrete things is somewhat ambiguous; this ambiguity or vagueness is characteristic of abstraction. Thus something as simple as a newspaper might be specified to six levels, as in
Douglas Hofstadter's illustration of that ambiguity, with a progression from abstract to concrete in
Gödel, Escher, Bach (1979):
(1) a publication
(2) a newspaper
(3)
The San Francisco Chronicle
(4) the May 18 edition of the
Chronicle
(5) my copy of the May 18 edition of the
Chronicle
(6) my copy of the May 18 edition of the Chronicle as it was when I first picked it up (as contrasted with my copy as it was a few days later: in my fireplace, burning)
An abstraction can thus encapsulate each of these levels of detail with no loss of generality. But perhaps a detective or philosopher/scientist/engineer might seek to learn about some thing, at progressively deeper levels of detail, to solve a crime or a puzzle.
Referents
Abstractions sometimes have ambiguous
referents; for example, "
happiness" (when used as an abstraction) can refer to as many things as there are people and events or
states of being which make them happy. Likewise, "
architecture" refers not only to the design of safe, functional buildings, but also to elements of creation and
innovation which aim at elegant solutions to
construction problems, to the use of space, and to the attempt to evoke an
emotional response in the builders, owners, viewers and users of the building.
Instantiation
Things that do not exist at any particular place and time are often considered abstract. By contrast, instances, or members, of such an abstract thing might exist in many different places and times. Those abstract things are then said to be
multiply instantiated, in the sense of
picture 1,
picture 2, etc., shown above.It is not sufficient, however, to define
abstract ideas as those that can be instantiated and to define
abstraction as the movement in the opposite direction to instantiation. Doing so would make the concepts 'cat' and 'telephone' abstract ideas since despite their varying appearances, a particular cat or a particular telephone is an instance of the concept "cat" or the concept "telephone". Although the concepts "cat" and "telephone" are
abstractions, they are not
abstract in the sense of the objects in
graph 1 above. We might look at other graphs, in a progression from
cat to
mammal to
animal, and see that
animal is more abstract than
mammal; but on the other hand
mammal is a harder idea to express, certainly in relation to
marsupial or
monotreme.
Physicality
A physical object (a possible referent of a concept or word) is considered
concrete (not abstract) if it is a
particular individual that occupies a particular place and time.Abstract things are sometimes defined as those things that do not exist in
reality or exist only as sensory experience, like the color
red. That definition, however, suffers from the difficulty of deciding which things are real (i.e. which things exist in reality). For example, it is difficult to agree to whether concepts like
God,
the number three, and
goodness are real, abstract, or both.An approach to resolving such difficulty is to use
predicates as a general term for whether things are variously real, abstract, concrete, or of a particular property (e.g.
good). Questions about the properties of things are then
propositions about predicates, which propositions remain to be evaluated by the investigator. In the
graph 1 above, the graphical relationships like the arrows joining boxes and ellipses might denote predicates. Different levels of abstraction might be denoted by a progression of arrows joining boxes or ellipses in multiple rows, where the arrows point from one row to another, in a series of other graphs, say graph 2, etc.
Abstraction used in philosophy
Abstraction in
philosophy is the process (or, to some, the alleged process) in
concept-formation of recognizing some set of common features in
individuals, and on that basis forming a concept of that feature. The notion of abstraction is important to understanding some philosophical controversies surrounding
empiricism and the
problem of universals. It has also recently become popular in formal logic under
predicate abstraction. Another philosophical tool for discussion of abstraction is
Thought space.
Ontological status
The way that physical objects, like rocks and trees, have
being differs from the way that properties of abstract concepts or relations have being, for example the way the
concrete,
particular,
individuals pictured in
picture 1 exist differs from the way the concepts illustrated in
graph 1 exist. That difference accounts for the
ontological usefulness of the word "abstract". The word applies to properties and relations to mark the fact that, if they exist, they do not exist in space or time, but that instances of them can exist, potentially in many different places and times.Perhaps confusingly, some
philosophies refer to
tropes (instances of properties) as
abstract particulars. E.g., the particular
redness of a particular
apple is an
abstract particular. Akin to
qualia and
sumbebekos.
In linguistics
Reification, also called
hypostatization, might be considered a
formal fallacy whenever an abstract concept, such as "society" or "technology" is treated as if it were a concrete object. In
linguistics this is called
metonymy, in which abstract concepts are referred to using the same sorts of
nouns that signify concrete objects. Metonymy is an aspect of the English language and of other languages. It can blur the distinction between abstract and concrete things:
Compression
An abstraction can be seen as a process of mapping multiple different pieces of
constituent data to a single piece of abstract data based on similarities in the constituent data, for example many different physical cats map to the abstraction "CAT". This conceptual scheme emphasizes the inherent equality of both constituent and abstract data, thus avoiding problems arising from the distinction between "abstract" and "
concrete". In this sense the process of abstraction entails the identification of similarities between objects and the process of associating these objects with an abstraction (which is itself an object).
For example, picture 1 above illustrates the concrete relationship "Cat sits on Mat".
Chains of abstractions can therefore be constructed moving from neural impulses arising from sensory
perception to basic abstractions such as color or
shape to experiential abstractions such as a specific cat to
semantic abstractions such as the "idea" of a CAT to classes of objects such as "mammals" and even categories such as "object" as opposed to "action".
For example, graph 1 above expresses the abstraction "agent sits on location".
This conceptual scheme entails no specific
hierarchical taxonomy (such as the one mentioned involving cats and mammals), only a progressive exclusion of detail.
The neurology of abstraction
Some research into the human
brain suggests that the left and right hemispheres differ in their handling of abstraction. For example, one meta-analysis reviewing human brain lesions has shown a left hemisphere bias during tool usage.
(4)Abstraction in art
Typically,
abstraction is used in the arts as a
synonym for
abstract art in general. Strictly speaking, it refers to art unconcerned with the literal depiction of things from the visible world
(5)--it can, however, refer to an object or image which has been distilled from the real world, or indeed, another work of art. Artwork that reshapes the natural world for expressive purposes is called abstract; that which derives from, but does not imitate a recognizable subject is called nonobjective abstraction. In the 20th century the trend toward abstraction coincided with advances in science, technology, and changes in urban life, eventually reflecting an interest in psychoanalytic theory.
(6) Later still, abstraction was manifest in more purely formal terms, such as color, freed from objective context, and a reduction of form to basic geometric designs.
(7)In music, the term
abstraction can be used to describe improvisatory approaches to interpretation, and may sometimes indicate abandonment of
tonality.
Atonal music has no key signature, and is characterized the exploration of internal numeric relationships.
(8)Abstraction in psychology
Carl Jung's definition of abstraction broadened its scope beyond the thinking process to include exactly four mutually exclusive, opposing complementary psychological functions: sensation, intuition, feeling, and thinking. Together they form a structural totality of the differentiating abstraction process. Abstraction operates in one of these opposing functions when it excludes the simultaneous influence of the other functions and other irrelevancies, such as emotion. Abstraction requires selective use of this structural split of abilities in the psyche. The opposite of abstraction is
concretism.
Abstraction is one of Jung's 57 definitions in Chapter XI of
Psychological Types.
There is an abstract thinking, just as there is abstract feeling, sensation and intuition. Abstract thinking singles out the rational, logical qualities ... Abstract feeling does the same with ... its feeling-values. ... I put abstract feelings on the same level as abstract thoughts. ... Abstract sensation would be aesthetic as opposed to sensuous sensation and abstract intuition would be symbolic as opposed to fantastic intuition. (Jung, [1921] (1971):par. 678).
Abstraction in computer science
Computer scientists use abstraction to understand and
solve problems and
communicate their solutions with the computer in some particular
computer language.
See also
{{col-begin}}{{col-break}}
{{col-break}}
{{col-break}}{{Wikipedia-Books}}{{col-end}}
Notes
-
[Abstract Engravings Show Modern Behavior Emerged Earlier Than Previously Thought]
-
[Ancient Engravings Push Back Origin of Abstract Thought]
-
[But an idea can be symbolized. "A symbol is any device whereby we are enabled to make an abstraction." -- p.xi and chapter 20 of Suzanne K. Langer (1953), Feeling and Form: a theory of art developed from Philosophy in a New Key: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 431 pages, index.]
-
[James W. Lewis "Cortical Networks Related to Human Use of Tools" 12 (3): 211-231 The Neuroscientist (June 1, 2006). ]
-
[Encyclopaedia Britannica]
-
[Catherine de Zegher and Hendel Teicher (eds.), 3 X Abstraction. NY/New Haven: The Drawing Center/Yale University Press. 2005. ISBN 0-300-10826-5]
-
[National Gallery of Art: Abstraction.]
-
[Washington State University: Glossary of Abstraction.]
Bibliography
- Eugene Raskin, Architecturally Speaking, 2nd edition, a Delta book, Dell (1966), trade paperback, 129 pages
- The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 3rd edition, Houghton Mifflin (1992), hardcover, 2140 pages, ISBN 0-395-44895-6
- Jung, C.G. [1921] (1971). Psychological Types, Collected Works, Volume 6, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01813-8.
External links
{{wiktionarypar|abstraction}}
تجريد(be-x-old:Абстракцыя)
ApstrakcijaAbstraccióAbstrakceAbstraktionAbstraktionAbstracción (filosofía)AbstraktadoتجریدAbstrakturAbstraction (philosophie)Abstracción추상AbstractionAstrazione (arte)הפשטהაბსტრაქციაAbstractio cogitationisAbsztrakcióАпстракцијаAbstractie抽象化AbstraksjonAbstrakcja (filozofia)AbstraçãoAbstracţieАбстракцияAbstrakciaАпстракцијаApstrakcijaAbstrahointiAbstraktionนามธรรมSoyutlamaAbstraksiýaАбстракціяتجرید抽象化
- content above as imported from The Pseudopedia
- "abstraction" does not exist on GetWiki
- time: 3:39pm EST - Fri, Mar 12 2010