Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
sorry
- no such article on GetWiki
- import not available from Pseudopedia
{{redirect|Hegel|other people with the surname Hegel|Hegel (surname)|the Lucio Battisti album|Hegel (album)|}}{{pp-move-indef}}
}}
Berlin, Kingdom of Prussia>Prussia | Germans>German|residence = Germany | German idealism | Founder of
HegelianismHistoricismPrecursor to
German Historism}}|main_interests =
Logic{{·}}
Aesthetics{{·}}
Religion Philosophy of history Metaphysics{{·}}
Epistemology Political philosophyAbsolute idealism{{·}}Dialectic Aufheben>Sublation{{·}}Master/slave | Aristotle, Plato, Heraclitus, Neoplatonism, Anselm of Canterbury>Anselm, René Descartes | , Johann Wolfgang von Goethe>Goethe, Baruch Spinoza | , Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz>Leibniz, Jean-Jacques Rousseau | , Jakob Böhme>Böhme, Immanuel Kant | , Adam Smith>Smith, Johann Gottlieb Fichte | , Friedrich Hölderlin>Hölderlin, Giambattista Vico | , Johann Gottfried Herder>Herder, Schelling | Theodor W. Adorno>Adorno, Alain Badiou | , Mikhail Bakunin>Bakunin, Karl Barth | , Georges Bataille>Bataille, Bruno Bauer | , Ferdinand Christian Baur>Baur, Murray Bookchin | , Bernard Bosanquet (philosopher)>Bosanquet, F. H. Bradley | , Robert Brandom>Brandom, André Breton | , Judith Butler>Butler, | (1) Albert Camus, Friedrich Wilhelm Carové>Carové, Benedetto Croce | , Arthur C. Danto>Danto, Guy Debord | , Gilles Deleuze>Deleuze, Jacques Derrida | , John Dewey>Dewey, Wilhelm Dilthey | , Fyodor Dostoyevsky>Dostoyevsky, James Doull | , Ralph Waldo Emerson>Emerson, Friedrich Engels | , Johann Eduard Erdmann>Erdmann, Emil Fackenheim | , Frantz Fanon>Fanon, Ludwig Feuerbach | , Kuno Fischer>Fischer, Francis Fukuyama | , Johann Philipp Gabler>Gabler, Hans-Georg Gadamer | , Eduard Gans>Gans, Giovanni Gentile | , Thomas Hill Green>Green, Jürgen Habermas | , Hermann Friedrich Wilhelm Hinrichs>Hinrichs, Martin Heidegger | , Heinrich Heine>Heine, Johann Friedrich Herbart | , Max Horkheimer>Horkheimer, Evald Ilyenkov | , Karl Jaspers>Jaspers, Peter Kaufmann (philosopher) | , Walter Kaufmann (philosopher)>Kaufmann, W., Søren Kierkegaard | , Alexandre Kojève>Kojève, Alexandre Koyré | , Hans Küng>Küng, Jacques Lacan | , George Henry Lewes>Lewes, Vladimir Lenin | , Lévi-Strauss, Hermann Lotze>Lotze, György Lukács | , Catherine Malabou>Malabou, Herbert Marcuse | , Karl Marx>Marx, J. M. E. McTaggart | , Karl Ludwig Michelet>Michelet, Jürgen Moltmann | , Nietzsche, John O'Donoghue (poet)>O'Donoghue, Heinrich Bernhard Oppenheim | , Wolfhart Pannenberg>Pannenberg, Robert B. Pippin | , Gillian Rose>Rose, Johann Karl Friedrich Rosenkranz | , Franz Rosenzweig>Rosenzweig, Arnold Ruge | , John Russon>Russon, Jean-Paul Sartre | , August Schleicher>Schleicher, Peter Singer | , Max Stirner>Stirner, David Strauss | , Leo Strauss>Strauss, L., Charles Taylor (philosopher) | , Roberto Mangabeira Unger>Unger, Lev Vygotsky | , Eduard Zeller>Zeller, Žižek|signature = Hegel Unterschrift.svg}}{{Hegelianism}}File:Stuttgart-Hegel-Birthplace-2006-04-09a.jpg|The birthplace of Hegel in thumb|200pxGeorg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel ({{IPA-de|ˈɡeɔɐ̯k ˈvɪlhɛlm ˈfʁiːdʁɪç ˈheːɡəl|lang}}; August 27, 1770 – November 14, 1831) was a German philosopher, and a major figure in German Idealism. His historicist and idealist account of reality revolutionized European philosophy and was an important precursor to Continental philosophy and Marxism.Hegel developed a comprehensive philosophical framework, or "system", of Absolute idealism to account in an integrated and developmental way for the relation of mind and nature, the subject and object of knowledge, psychology, the state, history, art, religion, and philosophy. In particular, he developed the concept that mind or spirit manifested itself in a set of contradictions and oppositions that it ultimately integrated and united, without eliminating either pole or reducing one to the other. Examples of such contradictions include those between nature and freedom, and between immanence and transcendence.Hegel influenced writers of widely varying positions, including both his admirers (Strauss, Bauer, Feuerbach, T. H. Green, Baur, Marx, Engels, Vygotsky, F. H. Bradley, Dewey, Sartre, Croce, Dilthey, Gadamer, Küng, Kojève, Fukuyama, Žižek, Brandom, Iqbal) and his detractors (Schopenhauer, Herbart, Schelling, Kierkegaard, Stirner, Nietzsche, Peirce, James, Popper, Russell, Heidegger, Deleuze). | (2) His influential conceptions are of speculative logic or "dialectic", "absolute idealism", "Spirit", negativity, sublation (
Aufhebung in German), the
"Master/Slave" dialectic, "ethical life" and the importance of history.
Life
Early years
Childhood
Hegel was born on August 27, 1770 in
Stuttgart, in the
Duchy of Württemberg in southwestern Germany. Christened Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, he was known as Wilhelm to his close family. His father, Georg Ludwig, was
Rentkammersekretär (secretary to the revenue office) at the court of
Karl Eugen, Duke of Württemberg.
(3) Hegel's mother, Maria Magdalena Louisa (
née Fromm), was the daughter of a lawyer at the High Court of Justice at the Württemberg court. She died of a "bilious fever" (
Gallenfieber) when Hegel was thirteen. Hegel and his father also caught the disease but narrowly survived.
(4) Hegel had a sister, Christiane Luise (1773–1832), and a brother, Georg Ludwig (1776–1812), who was to perish as an officer in Napoleon's Russian campaign of 1812.
(5)At age three Hegel went to the "German School". When he entered the "Latin School" aged five, he already knew the
first declension, having been taught it by his mother.In 1776 Hegel entered Stuttgart's
Gymnasium Illustre. During his adolescence Hegel read voraciously, copying lengthy extracts in his diary. Authors he read include the poet
Klopstock and writers associated with the
Enlightenment such as
Christian Garve and
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. Hegel's studies at the
Gymnasium were concluded with his
Abiturrede ("graduation speech") entitled "The abortive state of art and scholarship in Turkey."
Tübingen (1788-93)
At the age of eighteen Hegel entered the
Tübinger Stift (a Protestant seminary attached to the
University of Tübingen), where two fellow students were to become vital to his development—his exact contemporary, the poet
Friedrich Hölderlin, and the younger philosopher-to-be
Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. Sharing a dislike for what they regarded as the restrictive environment of the Seminary, the three became close friends and mutually influenced each other's ideas. They watched the unfolding of the
French Revolution with shared enthusiasm. Schelling and Hölderlin immersed themselves in theoretical debates on Kantian philosophy, from which Hegel remained aloof. Hegel at this time envisaged his future as that of a
Popularphilosoph, i.e., a "man of letters" who serves to make the abstruse ideas of philosophers accessible to a wider public; his own felt need to engage critically with the central ideas of Kantianism did not come until 1800.
Bern (1793–96) and Frankfurt (1797–1801)
Having received his theological certificate (
Konsistorialexamen) from the Tübingen Seminary, Hegel became
Hofmeister (house tutor) to an aristocratic family in
Bern (1793–96). During this period he composed the text which has become known as the "Life of Jesus" and a book-length manuscript titled "The Positivity of the Christian Religion". His relations with his employers becoming strained, Hegel accepted an offer mediated by Hölderlin to take up a similar position with a wine merchant's family in
Frankfurt, where he moved in 1797. Here Hölderlin exerted an important influence on Hegel's thought.
(6) While in Frankfurt Hegel composed the essay "Fragments on Religion and Love". In 1799 he wrote another essay entitled "The Spirit of Christianity and Its Fate", unpublished during his lifetime.
Career years
Jena, Bamberg and Nuremberg: 1801–1816
In 1801 Hegel came to
Jena with the encouragement of his old friend Schelling, who held the position of Extraordinary Professor at the
University there. Hegel secured a position at the University as a
Privatdozent (unsalaried lecturer) after submitting a
Habilitationsschrift (dissertation) on the orbits of the planets. Later in the year Hegel's first book,
The Difference Between Fichte's and Schelling's Systems of Philosophy, appeared. He lectured on "Logic and Metaphysics" and, with Schelling, gave joint lectures on an "Introduction to the Idea and Limits of True Philosophy" and held a "Philosophical Disputorium". In 1802 Schelling and Hegel founded a journal, the
Kritische Journal der Philosophie ("Critical Journal of Philosophy") to which they each contributed pieces until the collaboration was ended by Schelling's departure for
Würzburg in 1803.In 1805 the University promoted Hegel to the position of Extraordinary Professor (unsalaried), after Hegel wrote a letter to the poet and minister of culture
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe protesting at the promotion of his philosophical adversary
Jakob Friedrich Fries ahead of him.
(7) Hegel attempted to enlist the help of the poet and translator
Johann Heinrich Voß to obtain a post at the newly renascent
University of Heidelberg, but failed; to his chagrin, Fries was later in the same year made Ordinary Professor (salaried) there.
(8)(File:Hegel-and-Napoleon-in-Jena-1806.jpg|thumb|200px|Hegel sees the "world spirit on horseback", Napoleon.)His finances drying up quickly, Hegel was now under great pressure to deliver his book, the long-promised introduction to his System. Hegel was putting the finishing touches to this book, the
Phenomenology of Spirit, as Napoleon engaged Prussian troops on October 14, 1806, in the
Battle of Jena on a plateau outside the city. On the day before the battle, Napoleon entered the city of Jena. Hegel recounted his impressions in a letter to his friend
Friedrich Immanuel Niethammer:
I saw the Emperor – this world-soul – riding out of the city on reconnaissance. It is indeed a wonderful sensation to see such an individual, who, concentrated here at a single point, astride a horse, reaches out over the world and masters it . . . this extraordinary man, whom it is impossible not to admire.(9)
Although Napoleon chose not to close down Jena as he had other universities, the city was devastated and students deserted the university in droves, making Hegel's financial prospects even worse. The following February Hegel's landlady Christiana Burkhardt (who had been abandoned by her husband) gave birth to their son Georg Ludwig Friedrich Fischer (1807–31).
(10)In March 1807, aged 37, Hegel moved to
Bamberg, where Niethammer had declined and passed on to Hegel an offer to become editor of a newspaper, the
Bamberger Zeitung. Hegel, unable to find more suitable employment, reluctantly accepted. Ludwig Fischer and his mother (whom Hegel may have offered to marry following the death of her husband) stayed behind in Jena.
(11)He was then, in November 1808, again through Niethammer, appointed headmaster of a
Gymnasium in
Nuremberg, a post he held until 1816. While in Nuremberg Hegel adapted his recently published
Phenomenology of Spirit for use in the classroom. Part of his remit being to teach a class called "Introduction to Knowledge of the Universal Coherence of the Sciences", Hegel developed the idea of an encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences, falling into three parts (logic, philosophy of nature, and philosophy of spirit).
(12)Hegel married Marie Helena Susanna von Tucher (1791–1855), the eldest daughter of a Senator, in 1811. This period saw the publication of his second major work, the
Science of Logic (
Wissenschaft der Logik; 3 vols., 1812, 1813, 1816), and the birth of his two legitimate sons, Karl Friedrich Wilhelm (1813–1901) and Immanuel Thomas Christian (1814–1891).
Heidelberg and Berlin: 1816–1831
Having received offers of a post from the Universities of
Erlangen,
Berlin, and
Heidelberg, Hegel chose Heidelberg, where he moved in 1816. Soon after, in April 1817, his illegitimate son Ludwig Fischer (now ten years old) joined the Hegel household, having thus far spent his childhood in an orphanage.
(13) (Ludwig's mother had died in the meantime.)
(14)Hegel published
The Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1817) as a summary of his philosophy for students attending his lectures at Heidelberg.(File:Friedrich Hegel mit Studenten Lithographie F Kugler.jpg|thumb|right|Hegel with his Berlin students
Sketch by Franz Kugler)In 1818 Hegel accepted the renewed offer of the chair of philosophy at the
University of Berlin, which had remained vacant since Fichte's death in 1814. Here he published his
Philosophy of Right (1821). Hegel devoted himself primarily to delivering his lectures; his lecture courses on aesthetics, the philosophy of religion, the philosophy of history, and the history of philosophy were published posthumously from lecture notes taken by his students. His fame spread and his lectures attracted students from all over Germany and beyond.Hegel was appointed Rector of the University in 1830, when he was 60. He was deeply disturbed by the riots for reform in Berlin in that year. In 1831
Frederick William III decorated him for his service to the Prussian state. In August 1831 a
cholera epidemic reached Berlin and Hegel left the city, taking up lodgings in
Kreuzberg. Now in a weak state of health, Hegel seldom went out. As the new semester began in October, Hegel returned to Berlin, with the (mistaken) impression that the epidemic had largely subsided. By November 14 Hegel was dead. The physicians pronounced the cause of death as cholera, but it is likely he died from a different gastrointestinal disease.
(15) He is said to have uttered the last words "And he didn't understand me" before expiring.
(16) In accordance with his wishes, Hegel was buried on November 16 in the
Dorotheenstadt cemetery next to Fichte and
Solger.Hegel's son Ludwig Fischer had died shortly before while serving with the Dutch army in
Batavia; the news of his death never reached his father.
(17) Early the following year Hegel's sister Christiane committed suicide by drowning. Hegel's remaining two sons - Karl, who became a historian, and Immanuel, who followed a theological path - lived long and safeguarded their father's
Nachlaß and produced editions of his works.
Thought
Freedom
Hegel's thinking can be understood as a constructive development within the broad tradition that includes
Plato and
Kant. To this list one could add
Proclus,
Meister Eckhart,
Leibniz,
Plotinus,
Jakob Boehme, and
Rousseau. What all these thinkers share, which distinguishes them from
materialists like
Epicurus, the
Stoics, and
Thomas Hobbes, and from
empiricists like
David Hume, is that they regard freedom or self-determination both as real and as having important
ontological implications, for soul or mind or divinity. This focus on freedom is what generates Plato's notion (in the
Phaedo,
Republic, and
Timaeus) of the
soul as having a higher or fuller kind of reality than inanimate objects possess. While Aristotle criticizes Plato's "Forms", he preserves Plato's cornerstones of the ontological implications for self-determination: ethical reasoning, the soul's pinnacle in the hierarchy of nature, the order of the cosmos, and an assumption with reasoned arguments for a prime mover.
Kant imports Plato's high esteem of individual sovereignty to his considerations of moral and noumenal freedom, as well as to God. All three find common ground on the unique position of humans in the scheme of things, known by the discussed categorical differences from animals and inanimate objects.In his discussion of "Spirit" in his
Encyclopedia, Hegel praises Aristotle's
On the Soul as "by far the most admirable, perhaps even the sole, work of philosophical value on this topic".
(18) In his
Phenomenology of Spirit and his
Science of Logic, Hegel's concern with Kantian topics such as freedom and morality, and with their ontological implications, is pervasive. Rather than simply rejecting
Kant's dualism of freedom versus nature, Hegel aims to subsume it within "true infinity", the "Concept" (or "Notion":
Begriff), "Spirit", and "ethical life" in such a way that the Kantian duality is rendered intelligible, rather than remaining a brute "given."The reason why this subsumption takes place in a
series of concepts is that Hegel's method, in his
Science of Logic and his
Encyclopedia, is to begin with basic concepts like Being and Nothing, and to develop these through a long sequence of elaborations, including those already mentioned. In this manner, a solution that is reached, in principle, in the account of "true infinity" in the
Science of Logic's chapter on "Quality", is repeated in new guises at later stages, all the way to "Spirit" and "ethical life", in the third volume of the
Encyclopedia.In this way, Hegel intends to defend the germ of truth in Kantian dualism against reductive or eliminative programs like those of materialism and empiricism. Like Plato, with his dualism of soul versus bodily appetites, Kant pursues the mind's ability to question its felt inclinations or appetites and to come up with a standard of "duty" (or, in Plato's case, "good") which transcends bodily restrictiveness. Hegel preserves this essential Platonic and Kantian concern in the form of infinity going beyond the finite (a process that Hegel in fact relates to "freedom" and the "ought"
(19)), the universal going beyond the particular (in the Concept), and Spirit going beyond Nature. And Hegel renders these dualities
intelligible by (ultimately) his argument in the "Quality" chapter of the "Science of Logic." The finite has to become infinite in order to achieve reality. The idea of the absolute excludes multiplicity so the subjective and objective must achieve synthesis to become whole. This is because, as Hegel suggests by his introduction of the concept of "reality",
(20) what determines itself—rather than depending on its relations to other things for its essential character—is more fully "real" (following the Latin etymology of "real": more "thing-like") than what does not. Finite things don't determine themselves, because, as "finite" things, their essential character is determined by their boundaries, over against other finite things. So, in order to become "real", they must go beyond their finitude ("finitude
is only as a transcending of itself"
(21)).The result of this argument is that finite and infinite—and, by extension, particular and universal, nature and freedom—don't face one another as two independent realities, but instead the latter (in each case) is the
self-transcending of the former.
(22) Rather than stress the distinct singularity of each factor that complements and conflicts with others—without explanation—the relationship between finite and infinite (and particular and universal, and nature and freedom) becomes intelligible as a progressively developing and self-perfecting whole.
Progress
The obscure writings of
Jakob Böhme had a strong effect on Hegel. Böhme had written that the
Fall of Man was a necessary stage in the
evolution of the
universe. This evolution was, itself, the result of God's desire for complete self-awareness. Hegel was fascinated by the works of
Kant,
Rousseau, and
Goethe, and by the
French Revolution. Modern philosophy, culture, and society seemed to Hegel fraught with contradictions and tensions, such as those between the subject and object of knowledge, mind and nature,
self and
Other, freedom and authority, knowledge and faith, the
Enlightenment and
Romanticism. Hegel's main philosophical project was to take these contradictions and tensions and interpret them as part of a comprehensive, evolving, rational unity that, in different contexts, he called "the absolute idea" or "absolute knowledge".According to Hegel, the main characteristic of this unity was that it evolved through and manifested itself in
contradiction and negation. Contradiction and negation have a dynamic quality that at every point in each domain of
reality—
consciousness, history, philosophy, art, nature, society—leads to further development until a
rational unity is reached that preserves the contradictions as phases and sub-parts by lifting them up (
Aufhebung) to a higher unity. This whole is mental because it is mind that can comprehend all of these phases and sub-parts as steps in its own process of comprehension. It is rational because the same, underlying,
logical, developmental order underlies every domain of reality and is ultimately the order of self-conscious rational thought, although only in the later stages of development does it come to full self-consciousness. The rational, self-conscious (wikt:whole|whole) is not a thing or
being that lies outside of other existing things or minds. Rather, it comes to completion only in the philosophical comprehension of individual existing human minds who, through their own understanding, bring this developmental process to an understanding of itself. Hegel's thought is revolutionary to the extend that is a philosophy of absolute negation: as long as absolute negation is at the center, systematization remains open, and makes it possible for human beings to became subjects.
(23)"Mind" and "Spirit" are the common English translations of Hegel's use of the German "
Geist". Some{{Who|date=December 2012}} have argued that either of these terms overly "psychologize" Hegel,{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}} implying a kind of disembodied, solipsistic consciousness like
ghost or "soul." Geist combines the meaning of spirit—as in god, ghost or mind—with an intentional force. In Hegel's early philosophy of nature (draft manuscripts written during his time at the University of Jena), Hegel's notion of "Geist" was tightly bound to the notion of "
Aether" from which Hegel also derived the concepts of
space and
time; however in his later works (after Jena) Hegel did not explicitly use his old notion of "Aether" any more.
(24)Central to Hegel's
conception of
knowledge and mind (and therefore also of reality) was the notion of
identity in
difference, that is that mind
externalizes itself in various forms and
objects that stand outside of it or opposed to it, and that, through recognizing itself in them, is "with itself" in these external manifestations, so that they are at one and the same time mind and other-than-mind. This notion of identity in difference, which is intimately bound up with his conception of contradiction and negativity, is a principal feature differentiating Hegel's thought from that of other philosophers.
Civil society
{{See also|Civil society}}Hegel made the distinction between civil society and state in his
Elements of the Philosophy of Right.
(25) In this work, civil society (Hegel used the term "buergerliche Gesellschaft" though it is now referred to as
Zivilgesellschaft in German to emphasize a more inclusive community) was a stage in the
dialectical relationship that occurs between Hegel's perceived opposites, the macro-community of the
state and the micro-community of the family.
(26) Broadly speaking, the term was split, like Hegel's followers, to the
political left and
right. On the left, it became the foundation for
Karl Marx's civil society as an
economic base;
[JOURNAL
], Zaleski
, Pawel
,
,
, Tocqueville on Civilian Society. A Romantic Vision of the Dichotomic Structure of Social Reality
, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte
, 50
,
,
, Felix Meiner Verlag
,
, 2008
,
,
,
,
to the right, it became a description for all non-state aspects of society, including culture, society and politics.
(27) This liberal distinction between
political society and
civil society was followed by
Alexis de Tocqueville.
(28) For Hegel, Heraclitus's great achievements were to have understood the nature of the infinite, which for Hegel includes understanding the inherent contradictoriness and negativity of reality, and to have grasped that reality is becoming or process, and that "being" and "nothingness" are mere empty abstractions. According to Hegel, Heraclitus's "obscurity" comes from his being a true (in Hegel's terms "speculative") philosopher who grasped the ultimate philosophical truth and therefore expressed himself in a way that goes beyond the abstract and limited nature of common sense and is difficult to grasp by those who operate within common sense. Hegel asserted that in Heraclitus he had an antecedent for his logic: "... there is no proposition of Heraclitus which I have not adopted in my logic."
(29)Hegel cites a number of fragments of Heraclitus in his
Lectures on the History of Philosophy.
(30) One to which he attributes great significance is the fragment he translates as "Being is not more than Non-being", which he interprets to mean
Sein und Nichts sei dasselbe
Being and non-being are the same.
Heraclitus does not form any abstract nouns from his ordinary use of "to be" and "to become" and in that fragment seems to be opposing any identity A to any other identity B, C, etc., which is not-A. Hegel, however, interprets not-A as not existing at all, not nothing at all, which cannot be conceived, but indeterminate or "pure"
being without particularity or specificity.
(31) Pure being and pure non-being or nothingness are for Hegel pure abstractions from the reality of becoming, and this is also how he interprets Heraclitus. This interpretation of Heraclitus cannot be ruled out, but even if present is not the main gist of his thought.For Hegel, the inner movement of reality is the process of God thinking, as manifested in the evolution of the universe of nature and thought; that is, Hegel argued that, when fully and properly understood,
reality is being
thought by God as manifested in a person's comprehension of this process in and through philosophy. Since human thought is the image and fulfillment of God's thought, God is not
ineffable (so incomprehensible as to be unutterable) but can be understood by an analysis of thought and reality. Just as humans continually correct their concepts of reality through a
dialectical process, so God himself becomes more fully manifested through the dialectical process of becoming.For his god Hegel does not take the logos of Heraclitus but refers rather to the
nous of
Anaxagoras, although he may well have regarded them the same, as he continues to refer to god's plan, which is identical to God. Whatever the nous thinks at any time is actual
substance and is identical to limited being, but more remains to be thought in the substrate of non-being, which is identical to pure or unlimited thought.The universe as becoming is therefore a combination of being and non-being. The particular is never complete in itself but to find completion is continually transformed into more comprehensive, complex, self-relating particulars. The essential nature of being-for-itself is that it is free "in itself"; that is, it does not depend on anything else, such as matter, for its being. The limitations represent fetters, which it must constantly be casting off as it becomes freer and more self-determining.
(32)Although Hegel began his philosophizing with commentary on the Christian religion and often expresses the view that he is a Christian, his ideas of God are not acceptable to some Christians, although he has had a major influence on 19th- and 20th-century theology. At the same time, an atheistic version of his thought was adopted instead by some
Marxists, who, stripping away the concepts of divinity, styled what was left
dialectical materialism, which some saw as originating in Heraclitus.
Religion
{{Section OR|date=October 2012}}As a graduate of a Protestant seminary, Hegel’s theological concerns were reflected in many of his writings and lectures.
(33) Hegel's thoughts on the person of Jesus Christ stood out from the theologies of the Enlightenment. In his posthumous book,
The Christian Religion: Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion Part 3, he espouses that, "God is not an abstraction but a concrete God...God, considered in terms of his eternal Idea, has to generate the Son, has to distinguish himself from himself; he is the process of differentiating, namely, love and Spirit". This means that Jesus as the Son of God is posited by God over against himself as other. Hegel sees both a relational unity and a metaphysical unity between Jesus and God the Father. To Hegel, Jesus is both divine and Human. Hegel further attests that God (as Jesus) not only died, but "...rather, a reversal takes place: God, that is to say, maintains himself in the process, and the latter is only the death of death. God rises again to life, and thus things are reversed."
Works
Hegel published four books during his lifetime: the
Phenomenology of Spirit (or
Phenomenology of Mind), his account of the evolution of consciousness from sense-perception to absolute knowledge, published in 1807; the
Science of Logic, the logical and
metaphysical core of his philosophy, in three volumes, published in 1811, 1812, and 1816 (revised 1831);
Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, a summary of his entire philosophical system, which was originally published in 1816 and revised in 1827 and 1830; and the
Elements of the Philosophy of Right, his political philosophy, published in 1820. In the latter, he criticized
von Haller's reactionary work, which claimed that laws were not necessary. He also published some articles early in his career and during his Berlin period. A number of other works on the
philosophy of history,
religion,
aesthetics, and the
history of philosophy were compiled from the lecture notes of his students and published posthumously. Hegel's thought is not just a philosophical system, but a system which knows about its own relationship to the rest of experience which is not philosophy, and knows above all that its own knowing cannot exhaust this relationship.
(34)(File:Hegelgrave.jpg|thumb|left|Hegel's tombstone in Berlin)The
French Revolution for Hegel constitutes the introduction of real
individual political freedom into
European societies for the first time in recorded history. But precisely because of its absolute novelty, it is also unlimited with regard to everything that preceded it: on the one hand the upsurge of violence required to carry out the revolution cannot cease to be itself, while on the other, it has already consumed its opponent. The revolution therefore has nowhere to turn but onto its own result: the hard-won freedom is consumed by a brutal
Reign of Terror. History, however, progresses by learning from its mistakes: only after and precisely because of this experience can one posit the existence of a
constitutional state of free citizens, embodying both the benevolent organizing power of rational
government and the revolutionary ideals of freedom and equality. Hegel's remarks on the French revolution led German poet
Heinrich Heine to label him "The
Orléans of German Philosophy".
Legacy
{{See also|Hegelianism}}There are views of Hegel's thought as a representation of the summit of early 19th-century Germany's movement of philosophical
idealism. It would come to have a profound impact on many future philosophical schools, including schools that opposed Hegel's specific
dialectical idealism, such as
Existentialism, the
historical materialism of
Karl Marx,
historism, and
British Idealism.Hegel's influence was immense both within philosophy and in the other sciences. Throughout the 19th century many chairs of philosophy around Europe were held by Hegelians, and
Kierkegaard,
Feuerbach,
Marx, and
Engels—among many others—were all deeply influenced by, but also strongly opposed to, many of the central themes of Hegel's philosophy. After less than a generation, Hegel's philosophy was suppressed and even banned by the
Prussian
right-wing, and was firmly rejected by the
left-wing in multiple official writings.After the period of
Bruno Bauer, Hegel's influence did not make itself felt again until the philosophy of
British Idealism and the 20th century Hegelian
Western Marxism that began with
Georg Lukács. The more recent movement of
communitarianism has a strong Hegelian influence.
Reading Hegel
Some of Hegel's writing was intended for those with advanced knowledge of philosophy, although his "Encyclopedia" was intended as a textbook in a
university course. Nevertheless, like many philosophers, Hegel assumed that his readers would be well-versed in
Western philosophy, up to and including
Descartes,
Hume,
Kant,
Fichte, and
Schelling. For those wishing to read his work without this background, introductions to and commentaries about Hegel can contribute to comprehension, although the reader is faced with multiple interpretations of Hegel's writings from incompatible schools of philosophy. The German philosopher
Theodor W. Adorno devoted an essay to the difficulty of reading Hegel and asserted that there are certain passages where it is impossible to decipher what Hegel meant. Difficulties within Hegel's language and thought are magnified for those reading Hegel in translation, since his philosophical language and terminology in German often do not have direct analogues in other languages. For example, the German word "Geist" has connotations of both "mind" and "spirit" in English. English translators have to use the "phenomenology of mind" or "the phenomenology of spirit" to render Hegel's "Phaenomenologie des Geistes", thus altering the original meaning. Hegel himself argued, in his "Science of Logic", that the German language was particularly conducive to philosophical thought and writing.One especially difficult aspect of Hegel's work is his innovation in logic. In response to Immanuel Kant's challenge to the limits of
pure reason, Hegel developed a radically new form of logic, which he called
speculation, and which is today popularly called
dialectics. The difficulty in reading Hegel was perceived in Hegel's own day, and persists into the 21st century. To understand Hegel fully requires paying attention to his critique of standard logic, such as the
law of contradiction and the
law of the excluded middle. Many philosophers who came after Hegel and were influenced by him, whether adopting or rejecting his ideas, did so without fully absorbing his new speculative or dialectical logic.{{Citation needed|date=August 2008}}If one wanted to provide a big piece of the Hegel puzzle to the beginner, one might present the following statement fromPart One of the
Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences: The Logic:Hegel began to write in an obscure, esoteric, unintelligible manner after Fichte was removed from his professorship at Jena. Fichte had been accused of writing atheistic philosophy.
(35) Left and Right Hegelianism
Some historians have spoken of Hegel's influence as represented by two opposing camps. The
Right Hegelians, the allegedly direct disciples of Hegel at the
Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, advocated a
Protestant orthodoxy and the political conservatism of the post-
Napoleon Restoration period. The
Left Hegelians, also known as the Young Hegelians, interpreted Hegel in a revolutionary sense, leading to an advocation of
atheism in religion and
liberal democracy in politics.In more recent studies, however, this paradigm has been questioned.
(36) No Hegelians of the period ever referred to themselves as "Right Hegelians"; that was a term of insult originated by
David Strauss, a self-styled Left Hegelian. Critiques of Hegel offered from the Left Hegelians radically diverted Hegel's thinking into new directions and eventually came to form a disproportionately large part of the literature on and about Hegel.{{Citation needed|date=August 2009}}The Left Hegelians also spawned
Marxism, which inspired global movements, encompassing the
Russian Revolution, the
Chinese Revolution, and myriad revolutionary practices up until the present moment.Twentieth-century interpretations of Hegel were mostly shaped by
British Idealism,
logical positivism,
Marxism, and
Fascism. The Italian Fascist
Giovanni Gentile, according to
Benedetto Croce, "...holds the honor of having been the most rigorous neo-Hegelian in the entire history of Western philosophy and the dishonor of having been the official philosopher of Fascism in Italy."
(37) However, since the fall of the
USSR, a new wave of Hegel scholarship arose in the West, without the preconceptions of the prior schools of thought.
Walter Jaeschke and
Otto Pöggeler in Germany, as well as Peter Hodgson and
Howard Kainz in America are notable for their recent contributions to post-USSR thinking about Hegel.
Triads
In previous modern accounts of Hegelianism (to undergraduate classes, for example), especially those formed prior to the Hegel renaissance, Hegel's dialectic was most often characterized as a three-step process, "
thesis, antithesis, synthesis"; namely, that a "thesis" (e.g. the
French Revolution) would cause the creation of its "antithesis" (e.g. the Reign of Terror that followed), and would eventually result in a "synthesis" (e.g. the constitutional state of free citizens). However, Hegel used this classification only once, and he attributed the terminology to
Immanuel Kant. The terminology was largely developed earlier by
Johann Fichte. It was spread by
Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus in accounts of Hegelian philosophy, and since then the terms have been used as descriptive of this type of framework.The "thesis-antithesis-synthesis" approach gives the sense that things or ideas are contradicted or opposed by things that come from outside them. To the contrary, the fundamental notion of Hegel's dialectic is that things or ideas have internal contradictions. From Hegel's point of view, analysis or comprehension of a thing or idea reveals that underneath its apparently simple identity or unity is an underlying inner contradiction. This contradiction leads to the dissolution of the thing or idea in the simple form in which it presented itself and to a higher-level, more complex thing or idea that more adequately incorporates the contradiction. The triadic form that appears in many places in Hegel (e.g. being-nothingness-becoming, immediate-mediate-concrete, abstract-negative-concrete) is about this movement from inner contradiction to higher-level integration or unification.For Hegel, reason is but "speculative", not "dialectical".
(38) Believing that the traditional description of Hegel's philosophy in terms of thesis-antithesis-synthesis was mistaken, a few scholars, like
Raya Dunayevskaya, have attempted to discard the triadic approach altogether. According to their argument, although Hegel refers to
"the two elemental considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity" (thesis and antithesis) he doesn't use "synthesis" but instead speaks of the
"Whole":
"We then recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and consequently as the objective unity of these two elements." Furthermore, in Hegel's language, the "dialectical" aspect or "moment" of thought and reality, by which things or thoughts turn into their opposites or have their inner contradictions brought to the surface, what he called "
aufhebung", is only preliminary to the "speculative" (and not "synthesizing") aspect or "moment", which grasps the unity of these opposites or contradiction. It is widely admitted today
(39) that the old-fashioned description of Hegel's philosophy in terms of "thesis-antithesis-synthesis" is inaccurate. Nevertheless, such is the persistence of this misnomer that the model and terminology survive in a number of scholarly works.
Renaissance
In the latter half of the 20th century, Hegel's philosophy underwent a major renaissance. This was due to: (a) the rediscovery and reevaluation of Hegel as a possible philosophical progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists; (b) a resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to everything; and (c) an increasing recognition of the importance of his
dialectical method. The book that did the most to reintroduce Hegel into the Marxist canon was perhaps
Georg Lukács'
History and Class Consciousness. This sparked a renewed interest in Hegel reflected in the work of
Herbert Marcuse,
Theodor W. Adorno,
Ernst Bloch,
Raya Dunayevskaya,
Alexandre Kojève and
Gotthard Günther among others. The Hegel renaissance also highlighted the significance of Hegel's early works, i.e. those published prior to the
Phenomenology of Spirit. The direct and indirect influence of Kojève's lectures and writings (on the Phenomenology of Spirit, in particular) mean that it is not possible to understand most French philosophers from
Jean-Paul Sartre to
Jacques Derrida without understanding Hegel.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}}Beginning in the 1960s, Anglo-American Hegel scholarship has attempted to challenge the traditional interpretation of Hegel as offering a metaphysical system: this has also been the approach of
Z.A. Pelczynski and
Shlomo Avineri. This view, sometimes referred to as the 'non-metaphysical option', has had a decided influence on many major English language studies of Hegel in the past 40 years. U.S.
neoconservative political theorist Francis Fukuyama's controversial book
The End of History and the Last Man was heavily influenced by Alexandre Kojève. Among modern scientists, the physicist
David Bohm, the mathematician
William Lawvere, the logician
Kurt Gödel and the biologist
Ernst Mayr have been interested in Hegel's philosophical work.{{Citation needed|date=June 2007}}A late 20th-century literature in Western
Theology that is friendly to Hegel includes such writers as
Dale M. Schlitt (1984),
Theodore Geraets (1985),
Philip M. Merklinger (1991),
Stephen Rocker (1995) and
Cyril O'Regan (1995). The contemporary theologian
Hans Küng has also advanced contemporary scholarship in Hegel studies.Recently, two prominent American philosophers,
John McDowell and
Robert Brandom (sometimes, half-seriously, referred to as the
Pittsburgh Hegelians), have produced philosophical works exhibiting a marked Hegelian influence. Each is avowedly influenced by the late
Wilfred Sellars, also of Pittsburgh, who referred to his seminal work,
Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, as a series of "incipient
Méditations Hegeliennes" (in homage to
Edmund Husserl's treatise,
Meditations Cartesiennes).Beginning in the 1990s, after the fall of the
USSR, a fresh reading of Hegel took place in the West. For these scholars, fairly well represented by the Hegel Society of America and in cooperation with German scholars such as Otto Pöggeler and Walter Jaeschke, Hegel's works should be read without preconceptions. Marx plays a minor role in these new readings, and some contemporary scholars have suggested that Marx's interpretation of Hegel is irrelevant to a proper reading of Hegel. Some American philosophers associated with this movement include
Lawrence Stepelevich,
Rudolf Siebert and
Theodore Geraets.
Criticism
Criticism of Hegel has been widespread in the 19th and the 20th centuries; a diverse range of individuals including
Arthur Schopenhauer,
Karl Marx,
Søren Kierkegaard,
Friedrich Nietzsche,
Bertrand Russell,
G. E. Moore,
Eric Voegelin and
A. J. Ayer have challenged Hegelian philosophy from a variety of perspectives. Among the first to take a critical view of Hegel's system was the 19th Century German group known as the
Young Hegelians, which included
Ludwig Feuerbach,
Karl Marx,
Friedrich Engels, and their followers. In Britain, the Hegelian
British Idealism school (members of which included
Francis Herbert Bradley,
Bernard Bosanquet, and, in the United States,
Josiah Royce) was challenged and rejected by
analytic philosophers
G. E. Moore and
Bertrand Russell; Russell, in particular, considered "almost all" of Hegel's doctrines to be false.
(40) Logical positivists such as
Alfred Jules Ayer and the
Vienna Circle also criticized Hegelian philosophy and its supporters, such as
F. H. Bradley.Hegel's contemporary
Schopenhauer was particularly critical, and wrote of Hegel's philosophy as "a pseudo-philosophy paralyzing all mental powers, stifling all real thinking"
(41) Kierkegaard criticized Hegel's 'absolute knowledge' unity
(42) Scientist
Ludwig Boltzmann also criticized the obscure complexity of Hegel's works, referring to Hegel's writing as an "unclear thoughtless flow of words".
(43) Bertrand Russell stated that Hegel was "the hardest to understand of all the great philosophers" in his
Unpopular Essays and
A History of Western Philosophy.
Karl Popper makes the claim in the second volume of
The Open Society and Its Enemies that Hegel's system formed a thinly veiled justification for the
absolute rule of
Frederick William III, and that Hegel's idea of the ultimate goal of history was to reach a state approximating that of 1830s
Prussia. Popper further proposed that Hegel's philosophy served not only as an inspiration for
communist and
fascist totalitarian governments of the 20th century, whose dialectics allow for any belief to be construed as rational simply if it could be said to exist. This view of Hegel as an apologist of state power and precursor of 20th century
totalitarianism was criticized by
Herbert Marcuse in his
Reason and Revolution, on the grounds that Hegel was not an apologist for any state or form of authority simply because it existed: for Hegel the state must always be rational. Other scholars, e.g.
Walter Kaufmann and
Shlomo Avineri, have also criticized Popper's theories about Hegel.
(44) Isaiah Berlin listed Hegel as one of the six architects of modern
authoritarianism who undermined
liberal democracy, along with
Rousseau,
Helvetius,
Fichte,
Saint-Simon, and
Maistre.
(45) Selected works
Published during Hegel's lifetime
- Life of Jesus
- Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie, 1801
Science of Logic, tr. W. H. Johnston and L. G. Struthers, 2 vols., 1929; tr. A. V. Miller, 1969; tr. George di Giovanni, 2010
(Pt. I:)
The Logic of Hegel, tr.
William Wallace, 1874, 2nd ed. 1892; tr. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting and H. S. Harris, 1991; tr. Klaus Brinkmann and Daniel O. Dahlstrom 2010
(Pt. II:)
Hegel's Philosophy of Nature, tr. A. V. Miller, 1970
(Pt. III:)
Hegel's Philosophy of Mind, tr. William Wallace, 1894; rev. by A. V. Miller, 1971
Elements of the Philosophy of Right, tr. T. M. Knox, 1942; tr. H. B. Nisbet, ed. Allen W. Wood, 1991
Published posthumously
Secondary literature
General introductions
- Francke, Kuno, Howard, William Guild, Schiller, Friedrich, 1913-1914 WEB, The German classics of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: masterpieces of German literature translated into English Vol 7, Jay Lowenberg, The Life of Georg Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel,weblink 2010-09-24,
- Beiser, Frederick C., 2005. Hegel. Routledge
- Findlay, J. N., 1958. Hegel: A Re-examination. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-519879-4
- Gouin, Jean-Luc, 2000. Hegel ou de la Raison intégrale, suivi de : « Aimer Penser Mourir : Hegel, Nietzsche, Freud en miroirs », Montréal (Québec), Éditions Bellarmin, 225 p. ISBN 2-89007-883-3
- Houlgate, Stephen, 2005. An Introduction to Hegel. Freedom, Truth and History. Oxford: Blackwell
- Kainz, Howard P., 1996. G. W. F. Hegel. Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-1231-0.
- Kaufmann, Walter, 1965. Hegel: A Reinterpretation. New York: Doubleday (reissued Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978)
- Plant, Raymond, 1983. Hegel: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
- Singer, Peter, 2001. Hegel: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press (previously issued in the OUP Past Masters series, 1983)
- Stirling, James Hutchison, The Secret of Hegel: Being the Hegelian System in Origin Principle, Form and Matter
- Taylor, Charles, 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-29199-2. A comprehensive exposition of Hegel's thought and its impact on the central intellectual and spiritual issues of his and our time.
- Scruton, Roger, "Understanding Hegel" in The Philosopher on Dover Beach, Manchester: Carcanet Press, 1990. ISBN 0-85635-857-6
Essays
- Adorno, Theodor W., 1994. Hegel: Three Studies. MIT Press. Translated by Shierry M. Nicholsen, with an introduction by Nicholsen and Jeremy J. Shapiro, ISBN 0-262-51080-4. Essays on Hegel's concept of spirit/mind, Hegel's concept of experience, and why Hegel is difficult to read.
- Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.), 1993. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-38711-6. A collection of articles covering the range of Hegel's thought.
- Stewart, Jon, ed., 1996. The Hegel Myths and Legends. Northwestern University Press.
Biography
- Althaus, Horst, 1992. Hegel und die heroischen Jahre der Philosophie. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag. Eng. tr. Michael Tarsh as Hegel: An Intellectual Biography, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000
- Pinkard, Terry P., 2000. Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-49679-9. By a leading American Hegel scholar; aims to debunk popular misconceptions about Hegel's thought.
- Rosenkranz, Karl, 1844. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegels Leben. Still an important source for Hegel's life.
- Hondt, Jacques d', 1998. Hegel: Biographie. Calmann-Lévy/ Recension (2009) de cette biographie en tandem avec celle de Horst Althaus (1999), parue dans la revue Nuit Blanche : [http:dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/030141313 Le Commissaire et le Détective]
- Mueller, Gustav Emil, 1968. Hegel: the man, his vision, and work. New York: Pageant Press.
Historical
- Rockmore, Tom, 1993. Before and After Hegel: A Historical Introduction to Hegel's Thought. Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 0-87220-648-3.
- Löwith, Karl, 1964. From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought. Translated by David E. Green. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hegel's development
- Lukács, Georg, 1948. Der junge Hegel. Zürich and Vienna (2nd ed. Berlin, 1954). Eng. tr. Rodney Livingstone as The Young Hegel, London: Merlin Press, 1975. ISBN 0-262-12070-4
- Harris, H. S., 1972. Hegel's Development: Towards the Sunlight 1770–1801. Oxford: Clarendon Press
- Harris, H. S., 1983. Hegel's Development: Night Thoughts (Jena 1801–1806). Oxford: Clarendon Press
- Dilthey, Wilhelm, 1906. Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels (repr. in Gesammelte Schriften, 1959, vol. IV)
- Haering, Theodor L., 1929, 1938. Hegel: sein Wollen und sein Werk, 2 vols. Leipzig (repr. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1963)
Recent English-language literature
- Inwood, Michael, 1983. Hegel. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (Arguments of the Philosophers)
- Rockmore, Tom, 1986. Hegel's Circular Epistemology. Indiana University Press
- Pinkard, Terry P., 1988. Hegel's Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Temple University Press
- Westphal, Kenneth, 1989. Hegel's Epistemological Realism. Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Forster, Michael N., 1989. Hegel and Skepticism. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-38707-4
- Pippin, Robert B., 1989. Hegel's Idealism: the Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-37923-7. Advocates a stronger continuity between Hegel and Kant.
- Maker, William, 1994. Philosophy Without Foundations: Rethinking Hegel. State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-2100-7.
- Winfield, Richard Dien, 1989. Overcoming Foundations: Studies in Systematic Philosophy. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-07008-X.
- Laitinen, Arto & Sandis,Constantine (eds.), 2010. Hegel on Action. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Žižek, Slavoj, 2012. Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso
Phenomenology of Spirit
{{See also|The Phenomenology of Spirit}}
- Stern, Robert, 2002. Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-21788-1. An introduction for students.
- Cohen, Joseph, 2007. Le sacrifice de Hegel. (In French language). Paris, Galilée. An extensive study of the question of sacrifice in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit.
- Braver, Lee. A Thing of This World: a History of Continental Anti-Realism. Northwestern University Press: 2007. ISBN 978-0-8101-2380-9 This study covers Hegel's Phenomenology and its contribution to the history of Continental Anti-Realism.
- Davis, Walter A., 1989. Inwardness and Existence: Subjectivity in/and Hegel, Heidegger, Marx and Freud. University of Wisconsin Press.
- JOURNAL, Doull, James, James Doull, Hegel's "Phenomenology" and Postmodern Thought, Animus (journal), Animus, 2000, 5,weblink 1209-0689, August 9, 2011,
- JOURNAL, Doull, James, James Doull, Jackson, F.L., The Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit, Animus (journal), Animus, 2003, 8,weblink 1209-0689, August 17, 2011,
- Hyppolite, Jean, 1946. Genèse et structure de la Phénoménologie de l'esprit. Paris: Aubier. Eng. tr. Samuel Cherniak and John Heckman as Genesis and Structure of Hegel's "Phenomenology of Spirit", Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1979. ISBN 0-8101-0594-2. A classic commentary.
- Kojève, Alexandre, 1947. Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Paris: Gallimard. Eng. tr. James H. Nichols, Jr., as Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit, Basic Books, 1969. ISBN 0-8014-9203-3 Influential European reading of Hegel.
- Solomon, Robert C., 1983. In the Spirit of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Harris, H. S., 1995. Hegel: Phenomenology and System. Indianapolis: Hackett. A distillation of the author's monumental two-volume commentary Hegel's Ladder.
- Westphal, Kenneth R., 2003. Hegel's Epistemology: A Philosophical Introduction to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 0-87220-645-9
- Russon, John, 2004. Reading Hegel's Phenomenology. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-21692-3.
- Bristow, William, 2007. Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-929064-4
- Kalkavage, Peter, 2007. The Logic of Desire: An Introduction to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books. ISBN 978-1-58988-037-5. This work provides insights on Hegel's complex work as a whole as well as serving as a sure guide for every chapter and for virtually every paragraph.
- Scruton, Roger, "Understanding Hegel" in The Philosopher on Dover Beach, Manchester: Carcanet Press, 1990. ISBN 0-85635-857-6
Logic
{{See also|Science of Logic}}
- Burbidge, John, 2006. The Logic of Hegel's Logic: An Introduction. Broadview Press. ISBN 1-55111-633-2
- De Boer, Karin, 2010. On Hegel: The Sway of the Negative. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-230-24754-7
- Hartnack, Justus, 1998. An Introduction to Hegel's Logic. Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 0-87220-424-3
- Houlgate, Stephen, 2005. The Opening of Hegel's Logic: From Being to Infinity. Purdue University Press. ISBN 1-55753-257-5
- Rinaldi, Giacomo, 1992. A History and Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press. ISBN 0-7734-9509-6
- Schäfer, Rainer, 2001. Die Dialektik und ihre besonderen Formen in Hegels Logik. Hamburg/Meiner. ISBN 3-7873-1585-3.
- Wallace, Robert M., 2005. Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-84484-3. Through a detailed analysis of Hegel's Science of Logic, Wallace shows how Hegel contributes to the broadly Platonic tradition of philosophy that includes Aristotle, Plotinus, and Kant. In the course of doing this, Wallace defends Hegel against major critiques, including the one presented by Charles Taylor in his Hegel.
- Winfield, Richard Dien, 2006. From Concept to Objectivity: Thinking Through Hegel's Subjective Logic. Ashgate. ISBN 0-7546-5536-9.jdj
Politics
- Avineri, Shlomo, 1974. Hegel's Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge University Press. Best introduction to Hegel's political philosophy.
- JOURNAL, Kierans, Kenneth, 'Absolute Negativity': Community and Freedom in Hegel's Philosophy of Right, Animus (journal), Animus, 2008, 12,weblink 1209-0689, August 17, 2011,
- Lübbe, Hermann (ed.). Die Hegelsche Rechte. Texte aus den Werken von F. W. Carové, J. E. Erdmann, K. Fischer, E. Gans, H. F. W. Hinrichs, C. L. Michelet, H. B. Oppenheim, K. Rosenkranz und C. Rößler [The Hegelian Right]. Friedrich Frommann Verlag. 1962.
- Marcuse, Herbert, 1941. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. An introduction to the philosophy of Hegel, devoted to debunking the conception that Hegel's work included in nuce the Fascist totalitarianism of National Socialism; the negation of philosophy through historical materialism.
- Moggach, Douglas. 2006. "Introduction: Hegelianism, Republicanism and Modernity", The New Hegelians edited by Douglas Moggach, Cambridge University Press.
- Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 2: Hegel and Marx. An influential attack on Hegel.
- Ritter, Joachim, 1984. Hegel and the French Revolution. MIT Press.
- Riedel, Manfred, 1984. Between Tradition and Revolution: The Hegelian Transformation of Political Philosophy, Cambridge.
- Rose, Gillian, 1981. Hegel Contra Sociology. Athlone Press. ISBN 0-485-12036-4.
- Scruton, Roger, "Hegel as a conservative thinker" in The Philosopher on Dover Beach, Manchester: Carcanet Press, 1990. ISBN 0-85635-857-6
Aesthetics
- Bungay, Stephen, 1987. Beauty and Truth. A Study of Hegel's Aesthetics. New York.
- Danto, Arthur Coleman, 1986. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. Columbia University Press.
- Desmond, William, 1986. Art and the Absolute. Albany (New York).
- Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie, Einführung in Hegel's Ästhetik, Wilhelm Fink (German).
- Mark Jarzombek, "The Cunning of Architecture's Reason," Footprint (1, Autumn 2007), pp. 31–46.
- Maker, William (ed.), 2000. Hegel and Aesthetics. New York.
- Olivier, Alain P., 2003. Hegel et la Musique. Paris (French).
- Roche, Mark-William, 1998. Tragedy and Comedy. A Systematic Study and a Critique of Hegel. Albany. New York.
- Winfield, Richard Dien, 1996. Stylistics. Rethinking the Artforms after Hegel. Albany, Suny Press.
Religion
- Desmond, William, 2003. Hegel's God: A Counterfeit Double?. Ashgate. ISBN 0-7546-0565-5
- O'Regan, Cyril, 1994. The Heterodox Hegel. State University of New York Press, Albany. ISBN 0-7914-2006-X. The most authoritative work to date on Hegel's philosophy of religion.
- Cohen, Joseph, 2005. Le spectre juif de Hegel (in French language); Preface by Jean-Luc Nancy. Paris, Galilée.An extensive study of the Jewish question in Hegel's Early Theological Writings.
- Dickey, Laurence, 1987. Hegel: Religion, Economics, and the Politics of Spirit, 1770–1807. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-33035-1. A fascinating account of how "Hegel became Hegel", using the guiding hypothesis that Hegel "was basically a theologian manqué".
- Fackenheim, E. The Religious Dimension in Hegel's Thought. University of Chicago Press. 0226233502.
- Rocker, Stephen, 1995. Hegel's Rational Religion: The Validity of Hegel's Argument for the Identity in Content of Absolute Religion and Absolute Philosophy. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
- Andrew Shanks, Hegel and Religious Faith: Divided brain, atoning spirit (London, T & T Clark, 2011).
See also
{{Div col}}
{{Div col end}}
Notes
{{Ibid|date=March 2010}}
-
[Butler, Judith, Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth-century France (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987)]
-
["One of the few things on which the analysts, pragmatists, and existentialists agree with the dialectical theologians is that Hegel is to be repudiated: their attitude toward Kant, Aristotle, Plato, and the other great philosophers is not at all unanimous even within each movement; but opposition to Hegel is part of the platform of all four, and of the Marxists, too."Walter Kaufmann, "The Hegel Myth and Its Method", in From Shakespeare to Existentialism: Studies in Poetry, Religion, and Philosophy by Walter Kaufmann, Beacon Press, Boston 1959, page 88-119]
-
[Pinkard, Hegel: A Biography, pp. 2-3; p. 745.]
-
[Ibid., 3, incorrectly gives the date as September 20, 1781, and describes Hegel as aged eleven. Cf. the index to Pinkard's book and his "Chronology of Hegel's Life", which correctly give the date as 1783 (pp. 773, 745); see also (:de:Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel#Studien und Interessen|German Wikipedia).]
-
[Ibid., 4.]
-
[Ibid., 80.]
-
[Ibid., 223.]
-
[Ibid., 224-5.]
-
[Ibid., 228.]
-
[Ibid., 192.]
-
[Ibid., 238.]
-
[Ibid., 337.]
-
[Ibid., 354-5.]
-
[Ibid., 356.]
-
[Ibid., 658-9.]
-
[Norman Davies, Europe: A history p. 687]
-
[Pinkard, Hegel: A Biography, p. 548.]
-
[par. 378]
-
[See Science of Logic, trans. Miller [Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1989], pp. 133-136 and 138, top]
-
[Ibid., 111]
-
[Ibid., 145]
-
[See Ibid., 146, top]
-
[BOOK, Steven Schroeder, Between Freedom and Necessity: An Essay on the Place of Value,weblink 17 December 2012, 2000, Rodopi, 978-90-420-1302-5, 104, ]
-
[Stefan Gruner: "Hegel's Aether Doctrine", VDM Publ., 2010, ISBN 978-3-639-28451-5]
-
[Etext of Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)]
-
[Pelczynski, A.Z.; 1984; 'The Significane of Hegel's speration of the state and civil society' pp1-13 in Pelczynski, A.Z. (ed.); 1984; The State and Civil Society; Cambridge University Press]
-
[ibid]
-
In fact, Hegel's distinctions as to what he meant by civil society are often unclear. For example, while it seems to be the case that he felt that a civil-society such as the German society in which he lived was an inevitable movement of the dialectic, he made way for the crushing of other types of "lesser" and not fully realized types of civil society, as these societies were not fully conscious or aware, as it were, as to the lack of progress in their societies. Thus, it was perfectly legitimate in the eyes of Hegel for a conqueror, such as Napoleon, to come along and destroy that which was not fully realized.Heraclitus
According to Hegel, "Heraclitus is the one who first declared the nature of the infinite and first grasped nature as in itself infinite, that is, its essence as process. The origin of philosophy is to be dated from Heraclitus. His is the persistent Idea that is the same in all philosophers up to the present day, as it was the Idea of Plato and Aristotle."[WEB, Hegel, G. W. F., Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, 336–337,weblink 2008-07-01, ]
-
[BOOK, Justus, Hartnack, Lars Aagaard-Mogensen, Translator, An Introduction to Hegel's Logic, 1998, Hackett Publishing, 0-87220-424-3, 16–17, Hartnack quotes Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy Volume I.]
-
[WEB, Hegel, G. W. F., Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, 319–343,weblink 2008-07-01, ]
-
[BOOK, Frederick Charles, Copleston, Chapter X, 2003, Continuum International Publishing Group, 0-8264-6901-9, true, A History of Philosophy: Volume 7: 18th and 19th century German philosophy, ]
-
[The notable Introduction to Philosophy of History expresses the historical aspects of the dialectic.]
-
["[T]he task that touches the interest of philosophy most nearly at the present moment: to put God back at the peak of philosophy, absolutely prior to all else as the one and only ground of everything." (Hegel, "How the Ordinary Human Understanding Takes Philosophy as displayed in the works of Mr. Krug," Kritisches Journal der Philosophie, I, no. 1, 1802, pages 91-115)]
-
[BOOK, J E Walker, Thought and faith in the philosophy of Hegel,weblink 18 April 2013, 1991, Springer, 978-0-7923-1234-5, 163, ]
-
[Karl Ameriks wrote of "the famous 'Atheism Controversy' of 1798 in which Goethe eventually chose to allow Fichte to be removed [from his position as professor] in order to avoid complications. This event had momentous implications; it opened the door for new teachers [such as Hegel] in Jena, and it taught them to express any radical implications of their idealism in a much more esoteric form [italics added]." The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, Karl Ameriks, "Introduction: interpreting German Idealism, Section 1, The idealist achievement," page 6.]
-
[Karl Löwith, From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought, translated by David E. Green, New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.]
-
[Benedetto Croce, Guide to Aesthetics, Translated by Patrick Romanell, "Translator's Introduction", The Library of Liberal Arts, The Bobbs–Merrill Co., Inc., 1965]
-
[Hegel and Language edited by Jere O'Neill Surber. Pg. 238.]
-
[WEB, Slavoj Žižek, The Return to Hegel,weblink 2011-07-08, ]
-
[B.Russell, History of western philosophy, pg 701 chapter 22, paragraph 1]
-
[On the Basis of Morality]
-
[Søren Kierkegaard Concluding Unscientific Postscriptt]
-
[Ludwig Boltzmann, Theoretical physics and philosophical problems: Selected writings, p. 155, D. Reidel, 1974, ISBN 90-277-0250-0]
-
[(See for instance Walter Kaufmann 1959, The Hegel Myth and Its Method)]
-
[Berlin, Isaiah, Freedom and Betrayal: Six Enemies of Human Liberty (Princeton University Press, 2003)]
External links
{{Commons|Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel}}{{wikisource author}}
Audio
Video
Societies
Hegel's texts online
{{Navboxes|list={{continental philosophy}}{{metaphysics}}{{ethics}}{{philosophy of religion}}{{aesthetics}}{{jurisprudence}}}}{{Authority control|PND=118547739|LCCN=n/79/21767|VIAF=89774942}}{{Persondata |NAME = Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich|ALTERNATIVE NAMES = |SHORT DESCRIPTION = German philosopher|DATE OF BIRTH = 1770-8-27|PLACE OF BIRTH =
Stuttgart, Germany|DATE OF DEATH = 1831-11-14|PLACE OF DEATH =
Berlin, Germany}}